Citizen Kane
One aspect that I found important while viewing Citizen Kane was the dominance the director layed on Kane’s character. The director did this in many forms. But I will only cover how he utilized many focuses on his character as well as angles. The importance on Kane was high from the beginning of the film as the first seen was him on his death bed, laying in the dark creating a mysterious scene that left the audience curious for more, especially with the last word “rosebud” that rolled off his tongue. From that point on it was a scavenge to figure out the significance of ‘rosebud’ and Kane’s life. With the flashback from Kane’s diary as he was a child being shipped off to New York, Kane never failed to leave the view of the camera, always in focus whether it be the foreground or background, he was there. Kane, situated between individuals, can be seen far throughout the window. As he grew older, his character grew a large dominance in society, most all angles are from looking up at him or him looking down on people. The director made sure the his superiority ruled all. Even when Kane himself wasn’t the main focus of the shot his presence was, in the scene when the investigator went to Bernstein’s ( I think) office his mural hung high above the men. And as Kane left scenes he always fell into interesting perspectives so he never actually left the shot, for example, one of the last scenes of the move after his wife left him and he trashed the room, Kane walked out and down the hall, and although the camera was still pointing at the door, Kane left the scene by a reflection in the mirror of him walking away down the hall. All in all the intricacy of the importance of Kane’s superiority in this film is rather extraordinary, as Kane, of course, is the head honcho.
Thursday, February 27, 2014
Welles Innovative Techniques
Orson Welles Techniques
The film Citizen Kane written, directed, and produced by, Orson Welles introduces new techniques to film such as deep space with tracking camera and a sense of epic scale. Welles shows Charles Kane’s wealth with shots that depicted his elaborate estate Xanadu. Within Kane’s mansion Welles shows the scale of the place by using large tracking shots to show how much stuff Kane has purchased. An example of this is when Welles shows all Kane’s statues and various artifacts he purchased throughout his life at the end of the movie. All these shots show that Kane’s world is massive but empty. Kane is mogul emperor and lusts for power, he wants people to envy him and his life. In the scene at the the opera house Kane forces his wife Susan to sing Opera, at the end of the scene he is the only one clapping and this is shown at a low angle shot to exaggerate his presence. Kane wants others to love Susan and be jealous of him and his success. This shows that Kane is truly empty, he feels that everyone should love and respect him. One of the most important shots in the whole movie is when Kane is a child and his mother wants to send him away to boarding school. Wells uses deep space with tracking camera to show Kane in the back playing with his sled while his parents are discussing his future. This shot is revolutionary in cinema, but also shows that the last time Kane genuinely felt anything was when he was playing with his sled Rosebud. Orson Welles was able to create a complex character with innovative use of new camera techniques such as deep focus and tracking shots.
Kane and Xanadu
In Citizen Kane, I
found the use of the intro shot and final shot both very interesting. In the
beginning of the movie, it starts with a dissolving shot of the fence in hard
focus. This then leads to the slower progressing of getting closer and closer
to the window in Xanadu. These slow dissolving shots really show off the scale
of the place well. Watching this scene as we got closer and closer to the
window, gave me dark feelings about this place. Initially you don’t know why it
has become such a place but as we get further and further into the movie, we
learn that it has become a hive for material things. There is nothing inside
that Kane has that is sentimental, except for Rosebud which he can’t even find
because the place is cluttered with useless things. Everything bad in
this movie has led to the point were Kane builds this massive estate. It has
become the crowning jewel of the wealth that has ruined his life. It the last
few scenes of the movie, we see the workers beginning to burn all the worthless
and broken objects they could find. The eventually burn Rosebud the sled
marking the end of him and any memory of his past. After this we once again get
a shot of the gate and the “No Trespassing” signs on the fence. This final shot
of the crowning jewel of Kane’s wealth shows us how his money led to his
terrible fate.
Wednesday, February 26, 2014
Groundbreaking Cinematography in El Ranchero
During the first sequence of the interview of Susan Alexander in El Ranchero, Welles uses extremely impressive camerawork and editing to create a cohesive transition between exterior establishment and interior dialogue. The shot starts with a flash of lighting to give a motive for cutting from the previous scene. Cutting on a flash of lighting works because there is both a visual and audio motive: a bright flash and a loud crash. The shot starts on a shot of an illustration of Susan Alexander on the side of the building and pedestals up to the blinking sign reading “El Rancho.” Here, a lesser-gifted filmmaker would have cut directly from the exterior establishing shot to the interior of El Rancho during another lighting flash. Instead, Welles performs an incredible feat: the camera dollies in through the sign, tilts down and moves through the glass of a skylight into the building, where it tilts back up and dollies forward as it pedestals down to eye level.
From a technical standpoint, this shot is astoundingly well done. Today, filmmakers might use computer-generated imagery to perform a similar shot and not have it look as good as it does in this film. The IMDB page for this film says that a collapsible sign was built that could be split in two to allow the camera to pass through. To transition through the glass, the sequence must have been taken in two shots with one ending just above the glass and one one beginning in the same spot with the glass removed. A well-timed dissolve makes it seem that the camera moves through the window.
The shot was not technically impressive for the sake of being just that. Having such a shot is also very important in setting the mood of the scene. Long, continuous shots are very important throughout the film. Wells generally tries to use cuts as little as possible, and this scene is no exception. The use of long takes throughout the film is contrary to conventional filmmaking, in which cuts often occur within around seven seconds of each other. These long takes have the benefit of displaying a realistic and human presentation. Because the camera doesn’t instantaneously change positions, which is impossible for people to do, it gives the effect that the audience is in the same room in which the acting is occurring. Cutting in between an establishing shot and an interior shot would diminish the effect greatly. Instead, the long take at the beginning of the “El Ranchero” sequence, which continues without cutting far longer once the dialogue begins, continues this effect used throughout the film.
The first "El Rancho" shot is very impressive, but it is also overused. The shot is reused a few times later in the film, albeit truncated and possibly reversed, whenever the the the film enters or exits this building. Using it more than once detracts from the film as it becomes repetitive and disorienting. Perhaps Wells used the shot more than once because he was less concerned with multiple uses’ detrimental effect than he was proud of executing this complex and beautiful camerawork and editing expertly well.
Citizen Kane Breakfast Montage
The breakfast
montage scene in Citizen Kane was rich in story telling. Just the mornings that
Kane and his wife experienced, exposes so much of their true feelings, and how
their feelings evolve throughout the relationship. The first sequence Charles
keeps interrupting his new wife Emily, by telling her, she’s beautiful, and how
much fun they had the night before. The topics of the morning start becoming
more serious and the conversation start to become more aggressive, as they
continuously attack each other. One thing that keeps changing is their
wardrobe. The wardrobe starts off as very casual and then becomes quite formal
as they start feeling less open towards each other. Through out the breakfast
sequence Emily starts becoming green with jealous rage when Charles spends more,
and more time at the newspaper working on the Inquire. The ending sequence is
probably the most important, and the most revealing of their relationship out
of all of them. It shows a close up of Emily reading the Chronicle, and then it
shows a close up of Kane reading the Inquire, which are the two rivalry papers,
which also symbolizes the rivalry in their relationship. In the beginning they
had started sitting in very close proximity to each other, and as these
sequences drag on, the table starts becoming longer and longer, quite literally
symbolizing a space in-between them, and shows them growing apart.
Citizen Kane: Breakfast Montage Scene
Noella Robb
2/26/14
One of the most interesting scenes in the Orson Welles film, Citizen Kane, is the famous breakfast montage. It is clearly used to show the development of Kane and Emily's relationship through the passage of time, but the artistic and unusual way Welles chooses to show this gives reason for the scene to be such a famous, well-known one.
The idea of showing the Kane's relationship simply through a series of moments at a breakfast table is ingenious in itself. It manages to show the ups and downs of a complex relationship and personal changes by showing how the couple simply interact with each other at the start of their day. Ranging from subtle to blatant, the differences between the sequential breakfast moments are quick. In the beginning, both characters are quite loose and happy as they partake in their breakfast (or dinner, the time is somewhat unclear), and they are seated quite close to each other. The subtleties are found in the way they are dressed, and the objects on their breakfast table. Their clothing is loose and casual, and the objects are a series of simple tea sets, representing how informal, happy, and new the relationship is. Even the music is light and cheerful in the background.
As the montage progresses, the music gets more intense. The clothing that both characters wear become more and more restrictive, until they finally dress in formal wear even at the breakfast table. The tableware becomes more and more elaborate, and bigger objects sit between them at the table. And the most obvious of differences is that at the very end, Emily is seated at the other side of the table and both cease to make conversation, blatantly representing that they are distant towards each other, and that there is now little to no love between them.
The famous breakfast montage is a memorable scene in Citizen Kane, because it's seamless transitions, subtle and overt changes of mood and props, and changes of music make for the simple telling of a story of a "marriage just like any other marriage" to be something much more interesting to watch than it sounds.
2/26/14
One of the most interesting scenes in the Orson Welles film, Citizen Kane, is the famous breakfast montage. It is clearly used to show the development of Kane and Emily's relationship through the passage of time, but the artistic and unusual way Welles chooses to show this gives reason for the scene to be such a famous, well-known one.
The idea of showing the Kane's relationship simply through a series of moments at a breakfast table is ingenious in itself. It manages to show the ups and downs of a complex relationship and personal changes by showing how the couple simply interact with each other at the start of their day. Ranging from subtle to blatant, the differences between the sequential breakfast moments are quick. In the beginning, both characters are quite loose and happy as they partake in their breakfast (or dinner, the time is somewhat unclear), and they are seated quite close to each other. The subtleties are found in the way they are dressed, and the objects on their breakfast table. Their clothing is loose and casual, and the objects are a series of simple tea sets, representing how informal, happy, and new the relationship is. Even the music is light and cheerful in the background.
As the montage progresses, the music gets more intense. The clothing that both characters wear become more and more restrictive, until they finally dress in formal wear even at the breakfast table. The tableware becomes more and more elaborate, and bigger objects sit between them at the table. And the most obvious of differences is that at the very end, Emily is seated at the other side of the table and both cease to make conversation, blatantly representing that they are distant towards each other, and that there is now little to no love between them.
The famous breakfast montage is a memorable scene in Citizen Kane, because it's seamless transitions, subtle and overt changes of mood and props, and changes of music make for the simple telling of a story of a "marriage just like any other marriage" to be something much more interesting to watch than it sounds.
Joey Schulman
Film
Bauks
February 30, 2014
Citizen
Kane was one for the ages. Now I know why every movie and tv show makes some
reference to Citizen Kane; it’s because this movie was spectacular. The movie
used different cinematography to capture different themes, ideas, and much more
throughout Kane’s life. Right from the beginning of the movie, we saw the use
of shadows when the article writers were discussing Kane’s death and how to put
it in the paper. The effect of blacking out all of their faces was to show that
it didn’t matter who those men were because there were so many articles being
written and published about Kane, so the writers do not matter in the movie. We
saw the use of flashbacks in the Civil War scene with Kane and his parents in
Colorado. In this scene we heard Charles in the background, while at the same
time there is a civil war going on inside the house with Mrs. Kane, Mr. Kane,
and Fatcher. Throughout this scene, we always saw Charles, and he was always is
focus because he was being spoken about by his parents and Fatcher. Throughout
the film we saw other examples of different cinematography genius. There was
the use of high angle to show that Kane was more important than his wife. This
showed that Kane was not going to listen to his wife. He was going to do things
his way because he is more powerful. When his wife looked horrible on the bed
in the “sick scene” towards the end of the movie, the girl is out of focus, but
it seemed as if she was being sandwiched by two things that were in focus. One
being drugs to show that she is messed up and sick, and the other being Kane
because he is important and cares about his wife on the bed. Overall, an
amazing film due to the different cinematography used.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)